magic

Self-described ”Hidradenitis Suppurativa Advocates” should not really be considered by anybody as “homo superior” and hereafter, within this publication, shall be referred to as generic “people with HS”, or pwhs.

Some pwhs in the past may have ‘advocated’ against switching pharma ‘biologic drugs’ to their cheaper versions (aka biosimilars). Maybe they liked paying more for their medical treatment than they needed to? Maybe they wanted to send their public health systems spiralling into debt? Maybe they held shares in AbbVie? Maybe pharma put them up for the night and fed and clothed them, so they felt obligated to give back? Maybe it was in their contract or an addendum to their non-disclosure agreement? I don’t know.

Some pwhs (and health professionals) may ‘advocate’ for the use of MAGIC in the treatment of HS. Some may not be aware how lucrative MAGIC may be. Some may be still hurting financially from paying too much for their pharma drugs and are seeking to flim-flam other pwhs by convincing them that what they really need for HS is MAGIC, so they can get their (in comparison) tiny kickback?

All I know is that it may not be magic at all. It may just be human nature.

magic generates seven figures in revenue

'hs expert' recommends magic

'Patient organizations should rethink some close collaboration with pharmaceutical companies.'